#CONDOR 2 VS CONDOR PC#

Keeping their very different ancestors in mind - eagles and hawks with vultures of the Eastern Hemisphere, and (maybe) storks with vultures of the Western Hemisphere - their differences become more obvious and explainable. Many have large wingspans (the better to soar with), and featherless faces (the better to eat rotting carcasses with, according to one theory).ДЄnd each evolved to fill a vital part of the ecological web, breaking down and consuming what might otherwise rot and contaminate the surrounding area.ДЇrom here, there are almost exclusively differences. TheyвЂ™ve all evolved highly-acidic stomachs to tolerate rotting and diseased carrion. They all scavenge, though they find their carcasses differently. In the Venn diagram of Old and New World vultures, the space they overlap is small. New World vultures are in the family Cathartidae, and are believed to have evolved from storks (though this is debated in the halls of ornithology). Old World vultures are in the family Accipitridae, and closely related to hawks and eagles. One of the most fascinating things about New and Old World vultures is that they are an example of convergent evolution they evolved separately, from separate genetic ancestors, to fulfill similar ecological niches completely independent of one another. This division is because they arenвЂ™t related even a little bit. You know, objects in the distance looking 'blue' due to light scattering.ДЄll in all, if you fly gliders in real life and you want an affordable setup for winter proficiency training, get a good GFX card, VR headset, a good stick and pedals, and become a more confident pilot that way.In the ornithological world vultures internationally are divided into two different groups: Old World, encompassing Africa, Asia and Europe and New World, encompassing the Americas (As of the publishing of this article, this is the preferred zoological nomenclature, and it is therefore used throughout). Condor could REALLY use rayleigh scattering effects to make it look more realistic. IRL flying the astir is easier than condor since the real stick and pedals make your life so much easier, but IRL weather is less forgiving, IRL thermals are less reliable and if I may add one complaint at this point, it is cosmetic. I use Condor for proficiency training that way. On the other hand that is something that takes like 5 minutes to get used to in the real glider. Of course the Astir flies like a bus with it's bad roll rate and the stick forces are massive, something you can't get in a sim. The Astir flies pretty similar to the Libelle in Condor2, but having the correct stick and linearity settings in Condor is really crucial to get the maximum out of it. I fly Condor 2 with a CH fighterstick pro, and CH rudder pedals. Finally, in condor, especially if you fly online races, you will usually fly in better weather conditions and at higher wingloadings than you are likely to fly IRL. Less important, but to be complete, Condor also ignores effects of insects and raindrops, which IRL can have a non trivial effect on performance on some high performance planes. There is really no good way to simulate that. In real planes, some planes will give a better 'butt' feel than others. In a simulator, you dont 'feel' thermals or turbulence. You sit in your own seat, not forced in to a position by the actual glider seat, and you wont bump your head against a canopy in condor. However, a simulation has inherent limitations rudder and stick feel is determined by your joystick/rudder pedals, whereas IRL some planes might have light or heavy controls or they may not feel very balanced, give more or less physical feedback (FFB joysticks help a little, but its not the real thing and FFB rudders dont exist AFAIK) and that is an important part of the overall experience.

#CONDOR 2 VS CONDOR PC#

The flight characteristics are modeled meticulously, and the result is about as close to reality as you will get with a PC simulation.

Condor 2 vs condor